ABDUL REHMAN KHAN versus QAMAR-UZ-ZAMAN, DEPUTY ELECTION COMMISSIONERS, MULTAN DIVISION
Representatives of sections 12 (2) (iii) and 14 (5), representing the People Act 1976, were a petitioner of the Pakistan Telecommunication Corporation, which came with a copy of the appellant's order pursuant to four. It was ordered to pay the installments in which the first installment was paid. The remaining amount was to be paid in three equal installments which would be after the due date, thus, in connection with the payment of Pakistan Telecommunication. The question of default will not arise, the appellant had disclosed the receipt, under which all the arrears of other utility bills were paid. The guarantors were displayed on behalf of the defendants. The loan guarantor, however, does not fall under the purview of Section 12 (2) (iii), the public. In the record of the Act, 1976, the Returning Officer could not prove that the appellant had received the specified amount in writing.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer
