Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ALI AND 2 OTHERS versus THE STATE

The Pakistan Penal Code Section 326 [as amended by the Criminal Law (Fourth Amendment) Ordinance 1991]] Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 367 of the Code which has been charged by the trial court 5 326, was punished under PPC, the Criminal Law (Fourth Amendment) Ordinance, 1991 and was already enforced by the trial court, in which case, the accused was convicted under a section of the law. And the sentence was no longer present, the trial court should have recorded the conviction of the accused under the same provisions, if any, on the relevant time charge sheet According to the indictment, two accused were charged separately for committing the murder I Amd as the complainant filed in the FIR and was dropped by witnesses saying that all the accused were both late persons. The trial court, in such a cage, was bound to determine the criminal liability of each offender. Section 676767 worked under the CRPC but failed to do so. Such irregularities were not curable and failure to comply with the provisions of section 6767 of the trial court, the CRPC, dismissing the order passed by the trial court high court, dismissed their appeals. ????? Rule 6767, sentencing and sentencing for re-writing the decision in accordance with the provisions of the CCPC and the remanded case to the trial court. us immigration advocates from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer