Find a Lawyer

TARIQ MAQSOOD versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB

Police Rules 1934 R 12 6 (iii) [As Notification No. HP 11/15 7/97, as amended 20 10 1997] Punjab Public Service Commission Ordinance (II of 1978), Section 7A Convention Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Service Rules and Policy Decisions Priority for the positions of Police Inspectors was 26 years and 30 years for service candidates (applicants). The roll number was initially issued but, after that, it was notified that due to his age, police rules, as per Age 12 ((iii) of the Regulations of 1934 (as amended)). In terms of service Ineligible for the post, was appointed 21 to 30 years, while according to the policy decision of the department, such was the forty-year police rule, the status of the 1934 service rolls will be dominated by policy decisions, the Public Service Commission The age limit under the Rules decision would be 30 years, which was exactly within the boundaries of the pool. Icy decisions, even if considered independent of the rules of service, are common to certain rules, such as 34 police rules, 1934. Where the field is subject to the general guidelines as well as specific guidelines / rules, defeats the specific general and will be the applicable applicant. Admittedly, he was not eligible for appointment as a police inspector at that age because the applicant was issued a roll number and passed the written test, on the principle that he applied in the petition against the Public Service Commission. No further participation will be prohibited. Don't be against the law top advocate from Satyana Bangla lawyer