Find a Lawyer

IRSHAD BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD SARWAR

Copy of the suit-only record of rights for possession of pre-owned property in the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, in support of their claim of ownership in section 15 (c) \ strip \ and \ custody ownership. Has been placed where the ground in question was described as being located in the specific \ Pete A court of trial in support of such plea in the absence of evidence to prove ownership in a Petty / Appellate Court. No further evidence was placed on the fact, however, that the plaintiff's case decided that only the production of copies of the record of rights on the basis of the strip in relation to ownership in the plaintiff. I was not sufficient to exclude the post of evidence, thus, failing to prove that he was the owner of the ti strip owner in which the underground land trial was proceeding. The court rightly concluded that the plaintiff did not prove to be the owner in the "strip" in which the suit was contrary to the appellate court's decision in which it accepted the plaintiff to be the owner of the particular in strip owner, , It was set aside and the trial proceeded in court when you need a advocate from Madinah lawyer