Find a Lawyer

ABDUL GHAFOOR versus MIR MUHAMMAD

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/34 Guarantee, Complaint's cancellation and all witnesses to the prosecution were fully involved in the crime, All the prosecution's witnesses were clearly exonerated. The death of the accused and the death of the seriously injured complainant and the testimony of a prosecutor proved that the prosecutor's witness had recovered the accused. Not only were all the accused named in the FIR, but the complaining party suffered fireworks wounds. The Ocular version was fully supported to assist the deceased and the complainant and other prosecutor's witnesses, with the help of medical evidence which showed that the firearm injured on the victim and the injured persons. The presence of a count indicates that the trial judge had earlier rejected the bail application filed by the accused. The Link Judge later granted bail in the absence of a trial judge, not only was the round order to bail the accused through a fresh G-Link Judge not only wrong, but it was also neglected by the salient features of the case and the legal principles. However, the main reason for the grant of bail to the other two accused was that since the bail was granted to the co-accused, the rule of consistency was attracted, but in a particular case such justification for the grant of bail was granted. Was not valid for the purpose of the grant or otherwise only a temporary review of the evidence on the bail record , But in this case there was no guarantee he will be allowed to pass. The suspects, however, were set aside and integrated property advocates from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer