Find a Lawyer

W.T.AS. NOS. 3 TO 9/LB OF 1997, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1997. versus W.T.AS. NOS. 3 TO 9/LB OF 1997, DECIDED ON 3RD MAY, 1997.

Section 16 and 17 of the Wealth Tax Act 1963 failed to voluntarily file returns, the extent to which the assessor did not file a return in the assessment years from 1986 to 1987, 93, however, the Assisi did not. In response to the notice filed under, the rejected version, which was assessed on its own CIT (A), was assigned to the joint order of the diagnostic officer for the de novo action, the justification argument being That the order passed under section 16 of the Act was withheld for 2 years (limit) in accordance with the provisions of section 17 years. Because of the Act (A) Act, there was no merit in the matter of the SC because the returns were not voluntarily submitted, therefore, the SCCC has to file section 17 (1) of section 17 (1) of the Act. Targeted. Provides that when a return is filed in pursuance of notice, the time :: threshold assessment is 4 years from the end of the year and two years from the service of notice famous supreme court advocate from Kotli Loharan lawyer