Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WALI KHAN versus MUHAMMAD SALEH

The suit was dismissed by the trial court for specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 139 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) but again the Appeal Court reversed After the verdict, the High Court affirmed its decision and the appellate court's decision to examine the evidence on the Sanadia record. The High Court correctly stated in its judgment that if there was a possibility of another view by the High Court, even if the evidence was restored, the fact finding was not liable. Put aside on this score the defendants' position that the affidavit filed by the authors of the documents was not repudiated because neither the person had taken the affidavit to the court Neither the magistrate nor the person who confirmed it was further interrogated by the defendants. It is pleaded that the two minor witnesses were not presented in support of the sale agreement, no minor testimony could be concluded. Part of the document provided is confident of affecting its evidence that the High Court cannot interfere with the finding of a fact which was not immediately, even though a re-examination of the evidence could have led to a conclusion. Unless it is shown that such a finding of the court suffered a misrepresentation or by reading non-evidence that affected the merits of the merits, in which case the appeal to the Supreme Court Was discharged for famous supreme court advocate from Mangla lawyer