Find a Lawyer

MALIK MUHAMMD ASLAM versus FEDERAL DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION

Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 8 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Sincerity Complaint Against the List of Searchers A government employee in 1995 claimed that the respondents were initially on an ad hoc basis and were subsequently regularized. Therefore, they cannot be. His senior senior service tribunal found that his appointment of public servants was made on an ad hoc basis, which was later formalized only, so he could not have any complaints regarding regularization of respondents. The service tribunal also concluded that some of the respondents who were also graduate teachers had graduated before civil servant and were senior in the service. And that the appeal of public servants is multi-faceted. The appeal of public servants has been denied by the accuracy of the service tribunal that it had already raised a similar complaint before the service tribunal while implementing specific respondents and after the matter finally reached the Supreme Court, The remand for the verdict was obtained. The sanitary list issued by the department in 1995 was presented in this regard. The service tribunal, while rejecting the appeal of public servants, did not rule out this aspect of the matter; they were granted leave to appeal in the Supreme Court. But only against specific respondents. top advocate from Kamokey lawyer