Find a Lawyer

AIMANA BI versus KARAM DAD

The Mohammedan Law Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) inherited the last Muslim male proprietor's trial court finding that he was entitled to 2/3 of the property left by the deceased while he died unconscious. Thus, the mother of the deceased was entitled to 1/3. Thus, the property left by the deceased plaintiff was calculated as 2 Marla and he was in the same possession to the extent of 2 Marla, his case was dismissed. In another appeal, the trial court agreed to find the High Court. The plaintiff became part of the plaintiff as 4-Marla instead of 2-Maril based on the evidence as the court's valid judgment of the High Court found that during the second appeal hearing, the fact recorded in it was final. The results cannot be interrupted. By the two courts below; that in the absence of misidentification of evidence by the two courts below, the mere fact that a second view on the re-evaluation of the evidence was possible, simultaneously upset the second appeal of the High Court. Can't be done. The dispute raised was given to examine famous high court advocate from Choppar Hatta lawyer