Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR versus ZOHRA BEGUM

Generally the Constitution of O VI, R 17 and O XIV, R5, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) in its amended Medina dispute in relation to the legacy of the deceased plaintiff claimed that one of the heritage defendants Inheritance was denied, on the basis of such a modified case, the trial court did not compel the additional issue of relinquishment of an heir's part as the plaintiff's appellate court claimed in the trial court's review of the High Court. Decision and order are retained. The case was settled for trial, in which the amended plaintiff is directed to present an additional case on the basis of verification. The process of surrender by the plaintiff was of paramount importance in this case. The surrender case was raised by the defendant, which conflicts with the defendants, an additional issue should be tried on the surrender question, ial the court, thus raising the additional issue and the parties Appeal Court was not guilty of refusing to present evidence in support of relevant arguments; the appellate court did not even consider the trial court's seriousness. Had given. Setting up an additional matter relating to the surrender question and allowing the parties to present evidence on this request and then based on the evidence on record, the decision of such case was refused to appeal to the Supreme Court. power of attorney advocate Bhara Kahu lawyer