RAJ MUHAMMAD KHAN versus MUHAMMAD FAROOQ KHAN
Border Civil Servants Act 1973 R4NA to consider the departure of publicity endorsement with the foregoing effect of Article 912 of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) of the NANA West Frontier Province Civil Servants Act (1973). Was approved. However, the service tribunal was legally justified in considering and granting a defendant's appeal for eligibility, without recording any reason for the delay, when the initial objection to this effect was specifically the government's Had taken Whether the respondent's seniority in the cadre of the Additional District and Sessions Judge. His offer, which he made on 24 1 1985, may be effective from a previous date, as allowed by the Service Tribunal over the heads of other individuals who had previously been promoted and the defendants dismissed. If the decision of the Service Tribunal is not in line with the respondents' fitness to hold a particular position or it will be promoted to a higher rank or grade in which there will be no appeal to the Service Tribunal. Even if the North West Frontier Province (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, prevented the exemption or promotion of penalties imposed on respondents, it should be entitled to be considered for publicity; However, the countersigning authority was required by law to disagree with the reporting officer in the case of AC Rupees and whether the reporting officer or the countersigning authority had the duty of presenting the evidence before the service tribunal to justify the negative comments and whether the service tribunal. Formerly of the highest ranking. Defendants and the specific remarks approved in their AC in certain years did not misunderstand the facts and erred in law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Kohistan lawyer