UNIVERSITY OF PESHAWAR versus MOHSAN SHAH
Constitution Pakistan 1973 Rr 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art: 185 (3) Final Professional MB, Candidates appearing in the annual examination of the B section were declared unsuccessful in the subject of ophthalmology. ? The Constitutional plea before the High Court that they performed better than non-contesting candidates in the election science paper and still they were declared unsuccessful while non-contesting candidates were declared pass and the answer books The High Court has examined RR 21 to 26 while the High Court is entitled to re-examine. The Peshawar University Calendar concluded that the calendar Rr 23 does not correspond to the R 25 of the University calendar: Rule 23 of the calendar provides that only those candidates with more than 5 marks will be eligible for re-examination. The related article failed. R25 The valid procedure for the re-examination of the appeal was passed to examine whether the High Court correctly constituted RR21 in the unidentified order and whether the High Court finding was correct. It was not compatible with the letter and spirit of the KR25 calendar of the University of Peshawar, meanwhile, the Supreme Court suspended.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocate from Lower Dir lawyer