RAJA INDUSTRIES LIMITED versus IFTIKHAR AHMED
Code of Civil Procedure 1908 Section 17 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Withdrawal by the Controller of Rental Certified by the High Court Affirmed Tenants Under Section 12 (2) of his application, the decision was granted that the tenants found that a certain number of shops on the same road were in the possession of the landlord who inherited it from his mother. And such a fact has been suppressed. It rejected the rental control as well as the proceedings before the High Court, and the tenants of the High Court rejected, however, acknowledging that any application for leave to appeal for leave under High 12. The court order was not filed against the High Court order. 2) The CPC, therefore, ultimately obtained the tenant, however, expressly submitted that it was not possible to obtain a conclusive conclusion on the question of the facts of the tenants, other than their request. ? The appropriate time to vacate the premises in question was denied, but the tenants were given six months' time on the condition that they would continue to pay the rent regularly, if the tenant had been granted a court-granted tenure. If not handed over to vacancies upon termination, the controller will issue a writ of occupancy with the help of the police without notice to the tenants.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Mangal Sada lawyer