Find a Lawyer

IHSAN-UL-HAQ IHSAN versus SHEEDAN BIBI

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Defendants dismissed by the Appeal Court and the High Court on the basis of non-payment of sale by male kosheris on the sale of joint property. Was. After proper scrutiny of the evidence on the judgment of the claimant of the order, the seal was registered with the search for fact recorded by the two courts below, and no false statement, nor any material piece of evidence, could be read. It can be pointed out that both the parties have presented evidence on the question of consideration; it is of no use to admit it on the one hand or the other to prove the matter. Was not born and was not shown how the defendants suffered prejudice. The price could not be ascertained for the defendants when he appeared as his own witness and testified in the examination that how the sale price was shared in the e-prices suddenly the defendants. The appellate court also reviewed the evidence, as well as the High Court, which was not subject to any legal weakness, which could not be substituted by the lower courts for simultaneous fact-finding. A case was not made to allow leave to appeal the Supreme Court's leave. Denied in the circumstances patent advocate from Mohen Jo Daro lawyer