AMPAKE PIPE INDUSTRIES (PVT.) LTD. versus COLLECTOR CUSTOMS
Customs Act 1969 S: 97, 104, 116 and 190 Salt Fiat Act (IX of 1990), Sections 3 and 6 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Imports of stolen goods on importation of raw materials immediately on customs duty It was instructed to collect a certain amount of money and the tax importers appealed before the appellate tribunal customs when it upheld the legality of terminating the constitutional petition before proceeding with the constitutional petition. Was well settled and complied with, so it was important not only to allow the legal responsible to perform the duties that were assigned to them, but also to the High Court Importer It was also necessary to avoid the influx of illegal cases. After clear doubts, and fierce doubts about his ruthlessness in filing a constitutional petition, the High Court refused to exercise his discretionary jurisdiction in his favor, if the importer advised. He may request extraordinary jurisdiction over the High Court and when he has already terminated treatment. The constitutional request is not available to them
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Kalar Syedian lawyer