Find a Lawyer

MALANG SHAH versus UMAR SHAH

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) All the courts sued for declaration on the basis of ownership of the land by all the courts found that the plaintiff failed to prove his case. As it was alleged that the plaintiff was the plaintiff of the evidence in support of the proprietary claim and he had the testimony under his leadership, in this regard, the trial court had considered it fully and the appellate court plaintiff had also Did not claim that notice of any evidence escaped. From any forum that seized their suit, appeal or review, the scrutiny of the plaintiff's evidence by the High Court indicated that it was full of contradictions. That the forums below had correctly evaluated the evidence. That the re-evaluation of all material would lead to an irrelevant conclusion that the plaintiff had failed to establish its title or title to the land in question, concluding that a relief claim could not be made in the case. immigration advocates from Rahwali lawyer