Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

NOOR-UL-HAQ versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS


Sections 168 (2) and 180 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199, the preliminary injunction to extend the seizure period, orders the applicant's validator to confiscate the goods and issue showcase notices, The order of the petitioner will not result in any cause, under section 180, the Customs Act, 1969, the notice of cause was issued to the applicant, while the possession was not issued within a fixed period of two months; The owner of the goods, as such, had the right to return the goods in question, within two months the mandatory supply for notice was enforced to ensure that Immediately decide on the arrest and confiscation of Tim Authorities; and that the victims were not left to the customs authorities' unwanted behavior so that they could terminate their business.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Fizagat lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.