DEPUTY DIRECTOR, FOOD, BAHAWALPUR versus AKHTAR ALI
Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974 Section 2 (1) (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3J) Termination of services for grain eradication Service Tribunal separately imposed fines and restoration orders on employment of civil servants. The reasons for the separation, which weighed in with the service tribunal, were that a public servant quit his job on 19 7 1990, when the penalty amount was imposed, as he had already been charged 15 7 1990. Was retired from the job and therefore a disciplinary action against him was pending. abated = Persons who have retired from employment will not fall under the purview of a public servant, therefore, the right to appeal by a technically-service tribunal is waived, however, the arguments of the applicant (department). Was approved for consideration by a government employee. Involve a high volume of grain and, on the definition of a public servant by the service tribunal, the offenders will be left scot free. uch technical error, section 2 (1) (h), failed to cover retired civil servant in appreciation of public servant in the Punjab Civil Servants Act 1974, it was not deliberately appearing that no Supreme Court official in this regard There was no announcement, the leave was pending with the Appellant's Order of Tribunal in relation to the respondent's restitution allowing consideration of such question regarding the final settlement of the leave application.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Rabwah lawyer