ASAD ALI KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD
Services Tribunals Act 1973 Sections 4 and 5 (2) Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Increasing the Legal Corporation Employees It seems that the decision to uphold the Constitution Petition Service Tribunal The dispute regarding non-payment of the notice was presented to the defendant (authority), who was pressured and mistaken by the defendant employee in the notice of the High Court to suppress the facts by the foreseeable employee and refer to the service tribunal based on a false statement. Was based on the statement. In the terms of Section 5 (2), the Service Tribunals Act 1973, the wrong forum service tribunal shall be considered as a civil court for the purpose of deciding an appeal before and shall be used by such court under the Civil Procedure Code. All options are delegated. 1908, including the powers under section 12 (2), CPC, which ratified the decision, mandated the person challenging the challenge. Or seek your remedy by applying to the court on the order, deception, misrepresentation or jurisdiction of the person who issued the final judgment, order or ordered the employee's treatment on the principle of section 12 (2), c. The PC service will lie with the tribunal and not. An employee with the High Court was discharged before the service tribunal to pursue his treatment while his constitutional petition was rejected for failure to maintain
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Sihala lawyer