AHSAN RAZA versus RASHIDA LATIF
Sections 12 (2) of the CLC appeals relating to the original decrees of CPC Civil CCC and the OXL, R23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) relating to the land covered in the plaintiffs' cases. The case was dismissed, while the defendants were also excluded from the matter. The order was finalized in the plaintiff's case and no appeal or revision was filed under section 12 (2) against the same petition, however, the CPC was filed, which was allowed by the defendants to file fresh application. Withdrew from Determine the trial court's order under which defendants were allowed to file a fresh application under section 12 (2); The CPC's review of defendants was still pending in the High Court when it was the same. But the trial court also dismissed it and the appellate court upheld the High Court's remanded suit as well as the application under Section 12 (2), for a fresh trial under CPC. The second case of the petitioners was that they were rejected by a joint investigation of the facts of the two courts below, the High Court was in fact The question of coordinating the results of the courts can not intervene in the review was justified in deciding if not justify litigation to trial, nor sustainable and record the facts on vacation. The appellant was allowed to consider the shortages raised by the applicant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocate from Kakur Town lawyer