Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MEHERWAN CAVASJI IRANI versus KHUDA BAKHSH MARRI


Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 28 and Article 144 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), 9 XXIII, R 1 and O XLI, R 33 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Decision on preliminary matters on the basis of adverse possession of the plaintiff. The trial was decided by a High Court remand case. Defending defendant challenged the authenticity of the remand order, defendant claimed that there was no justification for obtaining a remand for trial for a fresh verdict on the preliminary matter, because the matter before the High Court was finally settled. In support of the dispute between the parties, it relied on the support of its representative O XLI, R 33, CPC, and emphasized that, given the circumstances of the case, the High Court involved the cases involved in the trial. I should have decided instead of sending. The latest decision was given by the plaintiff in leave of circumstances to appeal the dispute raised by the required examination.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates contact from Hayatabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.