Find a Lawyer

ABDUL JABBAR versus ABDUL SATTAR

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Section 12 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), for the specific performance of the Land Acquisition Agreement, the plaintiff claimed in its claim that the defendant had been under consideration for five years. Had occupied the land of By default, the defendant was obliged to sell the property in question for a specified amount of money, as the defendant claimed in the prayer. The mortgage loan was not returned after the expiry of the term, nor was the amount of profit paid to the specified amount, therefore, it was considered that the defendant was due to the failure to repay the mortgage loan and to pay the profits. Ali was paid a reasonable sum, the trial court dismissed the plaintiffs, while the appellate court decided the same High Court on the definition of evidence. Chapter. Placing the appellate court's verdict and decree, the trial court's jurisdiction restored the claim when he had full faith in his brother (plaintiff) and that his signature on his signature case was fraudulent. The source was obtained, thus, the defendant was deliberately executed on the plaintiff to establish the agreement under the question that the defendant was not proposed in cross-examination. That he had deliberately signed the contract in question or that he had mortgaged the property in question, in favor of the claimant upon receiving the money, even the terms and conditions of the agreement in his interim examination. Were not placed before the plaintiff, therefore, it turned out to be right. The plaintiff's execution of the proceedings is not proven best advocate from New Saeedabad lawyer