Find a Lawyer

INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MAHMOOD IKRAM

Punjab Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules 1975 R 6 Criminal Ordinance (XLV of 1960), Section 11 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 Government employees accused of criminal offense to be proved guilty by Punjab Impact of Investigation Criminals on the approval of the Police (Discipline and Discipline) Rules, 1975, although there will be a chance of reinstatement in society without any stain on the offense, in the case of a public servant, without prejudice, on probation. Benefits available under the Offenders Act, 1960, may be used by Departmental Authorities for corruption under the relevant competent and disciplinary line service service tribunals. There was no refusal to initiate the proceedings, it was not assigned for any reason, nor did it inspect section 11, investigating the ordinance of the offenders, the 1960 service tribunal only employing civil servants in the matter. Was presented with. Upon scrutiny, Arnett, who was in breach of state authority's law, proceeded to pay civil penalties by giving a showcase notice to a public servant, responding freely through entertainment and delivering hearings. But the action was taken and approved by the Punjab Police (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1975. Such departmental proceedings were neither reviewed by the service tribunal nor challenged effectively before it, nor were the departmental proceedings freely drawn against the civil servant indicating that the service tribunal. 'S decision was clearly misunderstood, they were set aside in the circumstances. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Bhalwal lawyer