Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB

Constitution Pakistan 1973 Section 10 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Applicants granted interest in advance to landlords in question on lease for three years in which Municipal Committee Lucy constructed some such land. As a result, the applicants moved into legal status. The Board of Revenue for Proprietary Rights but without success, the applicants took the matter to the High Court, which directed the Board of Revenue to decide within the stipulated time, the Board of Revenue found that the underground state was state land. The authority of the provincial government and the municipality related committee was not eligible for exemption on televised grounds but then the applicants approached the High Court for the grant of proprietary rights but successfully petitioners could not disprove the fact that The State Land Order of the Board of Revenue showed that the land under consideration Was allocated to City Park, and so the bus stand was also being moved for development. There were no good reasons to view City Park in the larger public interest because of the land grant policy. The source was constituted by the Frontiers, the High Court rightly found that the constitutional jurisdiction is arbitrary and equitable, cannot be exercised in its favor. The petitioners who had occupied the underground land after the death of the High Court, in this case there was no lack of justice, no appeal was allowed. best advocate from South Wazirstan lawyer