Find a Lawyer

FARRUKH BEGUM versus SHAUKAT JEELANI KHAN

West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance 1960 Section 26 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), O VII, R 11 Defendant's complaint regarding the Stability Scheme denied the Plaintiff's Complaint, where it terminated all treatment by the Board of Revenue Plaintiff. The plaintiff was dismissed under section 26, the West Pakistan Stability Holdings Ordinance, 1960 the West Pakistan Stability Holding Ordinance, 1960, will show that the allotment of various parcels of land to different land owners and related adjustments thereto. Objections related to the preparation and classification of the scheme, etc., were specifically heard by the officials working under the ordinance. The bereaved had the right to appeal to the Collector, Additional Commissioner, and then to review the Board of Revenue matters which were within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Board of Revenue or officers. In the hierarchy of the ordinance, Q cannot be said that the administration can not decide in the civil court, jurisdiction against the citizens regarding legal jurisdiction to entertain the matter decided by the authorities up to the Board of Revenue. Under which Article 26 is barred by the West. The confirmation in the Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960 Plain, did not show that the orders passed by the Consolidation Authorities were without jurisdiction or were subject to any legal weakness, so the issue of interference in the civil jurisdiction of the civil court The order for dismissal of the plaintiff by two is for the lack of jurisdiction under section 26, the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance 1960, which is valid and under the jurisdiction. law websites from Hunza Nagar lawyer