Find a Lawyer

ALTAF SAIGAL versus SEHYR SAIGAL

Civil Procedure Code Order VII, R II Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the petition filed by the CPC Plaintiff VII, the trial court High Court dealt with the clarification that the order of the question was Should not be ruled out. Barrier of Applicant's Appeal to Appeal to Trial Court or Appeal Court After this, the High Court made it clear on the respondent's request that respondents without asking for exception to their observations. A hearing will be held and that the order which is pending in his observation should not be construed as a barrier to the applicants for aggravating the matter before the trial court or the appellate court. Under such curriculum, the applicant had access. Both the High Court-approved High Court orders did not face any weakness. The High Court correctly found the issue raised by the applicant as an issue. O VII, R 11, CPC could have been properly raised in the petition so that the specific matter could be brought to litigation and decided in accordance with the law petitioner, after which, the High Court amended its written statement. Applied for who correctly specified. His remarks were not in line with the trial court's directive to allow an amendment request but had to be dealt with according to law, no interference with the High Court-approved orders was justified, as was the appeal. During the approval of the applications for, the applicant will provide a written statement in the case online advocate from Ghari Dupatta lawyer