MUHAMMAD MUKHTAR SHEIKH versus AZIZ AHMAD HASHMI
The applicant was not given any opportunity before the negative remarks to pass before the negative remarks listed in the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 Service Tribunal were passed, therefore, the applicants used frivolous words against fish, obstruction and boogie. Were not only unnecessary but were not germane to the dispute in question and therefore were not asked to meet the requirements of the law, such words were also speculated on their faces if the service tribunal had applied for the petitioner. If I wanted to say something about the personal character, he needed to give her a chance Define your status so that such remarks cannot happen without anyone listening. It will be deemed that the Remarks in the question, never approved by the service tribunal against the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Dargai lawyer