ALAM SHER versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF
Under Section 10 and 36 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), under the Gore Moor Food Scheme Collector, increase the entitlement of more food scheme claimants to acquire land ownership rights and the Additional Commissioner defendants of the Plaintiffs. Refused to give the property rights to, to go to the Board of Revenue in the review, filed a civil lawsuit for the claim that he was entitled to the property rights of the land acquired on the basis of the occupation, the trial court ruled against Decision made under section 36 of the Jurisdiction Act of the Civil Court Bar of Jurisdiction. Appellate Court v. 1912 set aside the trial court's order and decision and dismissed the plaintiffs' claim on the ground that the civil court had no jurisdiction to entertain and try such a case and The appellate court order was affirmed in the second appeal of the High Court. Civil court involved in section 36 of the Act was mandatory and the Civil Court had no jurisdiction to entertain the dispute about which the Revenue Degree had jurisdiction / authority over which orders passed by the Revenue Officers. The victim did not show up. It was an appeal / review procedure before the Board of Revenue, which he admits failed to take advantage of the civil court. Interfering where the Revenue Courts / Authorities had exclusive jurisdiction, even though there was no case on the merit, of course, they violated the conditions under which they were given the land under question for the applicants in their allotment. Failure to cultivate the land in accordance with the terms and conditions was denied
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Khangarh lawyer