Find a Lawyer

ALI DINO KHUHRO versus THE STATE

In testimony to the testimony of Section 13 (d) of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965, the prosecution examined two witnesses who were trained policemen and they both recovered information related to the detective, the arrest of the accused, the retrieval and capture of Kalashnikov. There were several different versions of how to export ammunition. On the contrary, different versions of the accused have created very suspicious contradictions in the case of the accused and their preparation, material contradictions and instability in the case were of such a nature that could not be taken lightly, the trial. The trial court did not analyze the evidence included by the prosecution. , But he considered the chief only in the examination and the accused did not give serious thought to passing the examination done by the lawyer of the court, in order to do full justice it was necessary to cross over to the Chief of Under-examination and Juxtation. Selection should be considered so as to arrive at the correct conclusion. The trial court awarded the accused, set aside, and acquitted the accused tax advocates from Chunian lawyer