Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION versus ABDUL RAZZAQ

Convene e testimony order 1984 Article 49 Omar Plaintiff, who joined the army after his retirement from the army, rejected the claim of the appellant, while the High Court upheld the trial court's order and decision. Valdetti Plaintiff admitted to the Army on 16 8 1943, and her actual date of birth was 16 4 1929 (as her claimant) could not. Permission to join the Army Service was under 16 years of age because the entry copy in the Birth Register was issued to the plaintiff on 12 8 1935, when he issued a civil court statement in 1971 in a lawsuit filed by the plaintiff against the public court. Had received. The large authorities that maintain the Birth Register should have applied, at least according to them, because the defendants decide under question, without any imagination, no one can be bound, about the Excel Appellant. I was not offered any explanation as to why the plaintiff waited 36 years to obtain the explanation, which the High Court submitted, regarding the date of the school leaving certificate different from the card in the National Identity Card. Was not convinced to be. The first appellate court (Additional District Judge) was adjourned to the High Court for good reason, while the first appellate court under which the plaintiff's case was dismissed was reinstated by the Supreme Court. registration advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer