Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

KHALID MAHMOOD versus MUHAMMAD TAREEF


Article 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 and Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was decided against the applicant for the recovery of his wife and child. Did not comply with the court directive. The petitioner's request for a ban on the petitioner's request for a restraint on the High Court was dismissed because it was his duty to provide restitution. The petitioner's request for a wife and child that he was a poor man was not recorded from any record that the applicant was faulty and unable to pay his wife and child care allowance, he claimed. That the applicant is a student and failed to pay restitution because of circumstances the permit was denied that he would not be entitled to claim exemption from the payment of restitution allowance.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Chishtian lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.