JUMA KHAN versus PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTAN
Rules of Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules 1973 R 4 Secretariat Instructions, 1983 (Reprint), R 34 Misdemeanor Minor penalties Minor penalties for misconduct against a civil servant The basis of a file inquiry officer's disappearance Was on Not sure if the official employee received the file in question, the facts of his inquiry report make it clear that when the file is delivered to any department, receipt for such delivery. But there was no such receipt from the public servant's office. Prior to the Inquiry Officer, the responsibility of maintaining the files presented by the relevant department was to the Administrative Officer (the co-accused), whose oral statement that he had handed over the file to the public servant (whose statement was made by the public servant) Was rejected) based on a censored search record. Government employee The public servant should have had the benefit of the doubt in such a situation, even though the insurance penalty was fine, neither the penalty nor the censorship was imposed in these circumstances, despite the future termination of the public servant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Mandra lawyer