Find a Lawyer

QAIM DIN versus BEERO

Civil Code of Conduct 1908 Sections 11 and 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Two competitors contending that the competitor was claiming to be the owner of the underground land against the seller on the basis of the agreement on the sale of the registered sale dead petitioner. Filed a contract specific performance claim but was not included in the claim, the seller / respondent vendor alleging in a written statement to the court that he had already sold the land through a registered cell deed And, after that, he declared himself absent the former vendor / respondent was sued for acquiring knowledge about which It has been claimed that the petitioner's request for land related question was not binding on him as he was not a party to the matter. The respondent cannot be bound by the judicial justification granted in the first case of the applicant nor can the decree passed in the previous case serve as a judiciary. In the favor of the applicants, the case filed by the respondents for the two parties in favor of the applicants was not the same order which required them to submit the specified amount by the due date but no evidence of such reserves was given to the court. I was not presented because allegedly in favor of the petitioner for the pre-arrest order, he failed to deposit the deductible in the court till the time appointed by the court, the alleged oral sale in favor of the applicant. Against, the defendant was a registered Sale David in favor of which the appeal to appeal was dismissed. criminal advocate from Usta Mohammad lawyer