Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BASHARAT versus STATE

Criminals convicted under Section 243 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CRPC) and 439 West Pakistan Pure Food Ordinance (VII of 1960), Section 6 (1) (a) (c) on the conviction of a criminal magistrate. Entering a plea of guilt that was not in accordance with the law, because when the accused was read to the accused, he confessed to his crime and the magistrate found him guilty and sentenced him immediately. Was not present to show that the accused was given after his conviction, any occasion to show why he could not be imposed under section 243. The CRPC provided that the accused could not be convicted of confession if he could show good reason why he could not be convicted, on the basis of his confession. Apart from being guilty of crime, punishment should be given. Therefore, the High Court did not accept the defendant's review and retained it, setting aside the conviction and sentence of the accused. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Kotmomin lawyer