Find a Lawyer

MUSTEHKUM CEMENT LIMITED versus ABDUL RASHID

Section 2 (xxviii) and 25A Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Constitution of Pakistan 1973 did not find the employee's dispute as to the employee's position as a labor forum regarding the status of the employees, therefore, His complaint was dismissed as not being able to maintain the request, however, the High Court considered the employee to be an employee and implemented it according to its merits. Accuracy Establishment claimed that the employee was performing the duties of supervision, considering the definition of the employee given in Section 2 (xxviii), Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. And the administrative capacity, as posted by the manager, is more than Rs 4,000 per month, therefore, he cannot be considered a laborer. And even if the employee is considered an employee, the High Court, having established its opinion in the constitutional jurisdiction, relinquished its jurisdiction in deciding its case on the merits, which the High Court had not disputed. It may be necessary to consider, in which case the leave of appeal was granted family advocate from Ranipur lawyer