For the pre-arrest of Section 21 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right to Purchase Act, 1993, the court directed the appellant to deposit a fifth of the amount of premature money. The trial was granted in the trial court and the plaintiff was allowed an extension of time to submit the required amount. The mother-in-law plaintiff moved the court's request for extension to the court due to her wife's illness, which was backed by a medical certificate that allowed the medical certificate to be continued by a qualified doctor. Was not relied upon by the appellate court first. The First Appellate Court held that the exercise of discretion was based on relevant facts and circumstances. Such discretion, based on judicial principles, would not guarantee any interference. High court
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
