Find a Lawyer

MOHSIN ATTA versus THE STATE

West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Criminal Code (v. 1898), absence of S-103 accused and a search warrant was made in the house without witnesses, Kalashnikov with no license was recovered against the accused. The alleged recovery of the illegal weapon was made while only Kalashnikov was claimed to be unlicensed during the trial, yet the police conducted a search without a search warrant and violated the necessary limits. Did not share witnesses from the eligible area despite the presence of. In the absence of accidental explanation of Section 103, the CRPC was sufficient to prove that Kalashnikov's alleged recovery from the accused's home was a lie and it was agreed that there was no evidence on record. At that time, the accused was in his house. When Kalashnikov allegedly entered the policeman's house, he was recovered from the house in his absence without a search warrant, which violates the authority as well as the law and human rights. There was a breach case, the porcupineer failed miserably to prove the charges against the accused and the accused involved in a false and just case, the impugned order passed by the trial court was set aside and the accused was acquitted. The charges against him were dismissed lawer from fb area from Kundina lawyer