SHAUKAT ALI versus LAND ACQUISITION COLLECTOR, RAWALPINDI
Land acquisition Act 1894 Sections 18 and 23 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), the acquisition of the land determined by the collector was challenged before the referee court, which increased the compensation under which the referee court. The decision was placed on record by the High Court on accuracy. In which the average price per canal was twice the price set by the referee court, consideration was not taken to determine the market value as it relates to the sale of a small piece of land for which 1992C. LC1775 was relied upon to allow the appeal to be considered if the CLC 1775 in 1992 established the principle that if the land was small, it would be legally valid If its value is maximized, it is necessary to determine its value at a rate lower than the value of the same land. Examination by the Supreme Court is required. Will Being of public importance has a bearing on pricing in future land acquisition matters. Even if the landlord is not entitled to some increase in compensation for the interim period between the notification and the award. And whether the acts recorded on the record cannot be the basis for determining the sale price due to the principle set forth in PLD 1986 SC 158 and PLD 1988 SC 32.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Chitral lawyer