Find a Lawyer

HUMA NASEEB versus INSPECTOR-GENERAL OF POLICE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Police Rules 1934 R12 2 (3) Sub-inspector police as a representative of a public servant for confirming the postponement of a civil servant's certification case was dismissed from the date of his appointment and promotion only when he The case record of was not available on the first occasion. Consideration was considered for certiorari The public servant could not be deprived of his right to certify his due date because his case was not delayed due to his mistake. The date of his appointment was to be examined and his seniority revealed, and then from the date of confirmation he was confirmed by the date of the first appointment of seniority CCE of several officers but it was said that the appointment of a public servant. It was confirmed about seven years later. No rule has been shown under which the verification date cannot be the date of appointment of a public servant or it can be at any date. The authorized authority may, without giving any reason, justify the discretion of the public servant who has the services He had a good record and was well qualified and earned a Commandment Certificate and a cash award and he never received any negative reports in his career and fulfilled his requirements. Passing the scheduled training course which was necessary for certification as it can be confirmed from the date of the appointment of the Sub Inspector Police, especially since the date of the appointment of other public servants who were appointed more later than the civil servant. Confirmed famous lower court advocate from Kohat lawyer