Find a Lawyer

IMAM DI versus THE STATE

Pakistan Penal Code Section 392/411 Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 (3) Second on the charge of gang rape and while leaving the house of the prosecution, he along with his belongings including jewelry, cash and TV sets were taken away, even though the case was filed with a delay of six hours, but there was no fatal case for such delay because there was a gap between the incident and the place. The police station was 6km and it was a nightly event involving a nature incident involving rape and robbery, enough to get the victim out of shock and collect his senses. Time was needed In such a case, the woman lodges a complaint with the neighbors and the villagers immediately upon being notified that the victim is on the spot and is wasting a lot of time. There was no delay in describing the incident in this way, therefore, there was no delay in filing an FIR that could justify the prosecution that it was recorded after meditation and contained a fabricated story. In which the presence of the prosecution's witness was clearly listed in the FIR, so it could not be declared in any way. The opportunity was impacted by the accused's testimony through the defendant's recovery, and when the defendants disclosed about them, in the absence of any animosity between the parties, the prosecution's statement with the help of medical evidence and a positive report from the Chemical Examiner. It was not enough to establish a charge of rape against. In the context of medical evidence, the accused admitted that the victim's vaginal bush was best law firm from Garh Maharaja lawyer