Find a Lawyer

FAISAL IQBAL versus THE STATE

Additional sessions of the Special Court after the implementation of the Counter Terrorism Act 1997 section 302/324/148/149/109 Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 2 (e), 6, 7, 12 and 13 Transfer the matter to the judge. In the case of exchanging the accused's Presiding Officer of the Special Court, 1997, such exchange was challenged in the absence of any provision in the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, whereby the sessions court or any court The pending case can be transferred to a special court before another court. After being set up under the Act, his case could not be moved to a special court because the accused's imprisonment was removed because there was no doubt that the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, were once abandoned. The schedule for the first time proved to be a crime, and there was no court other than the special court. Under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, a court may try such an offense and that any such case pending in any other court will be automatically transferred to the special court under the provisions of the Anti Terror. Such a question was decided on the basis of an FIR for the purpose of determining whether a crime was a scheduled offense, for the purpose of determining whether a crime was a scheduled offense by the Special Court from any and every court. Was to go and the other material produced by the prosecution at the time of the challan special court hearing was to decide on the basis of such material whether a learned action should be taken once a crime is declared a scheduled offense So, the ordinary courts will lose their jurisdiction. Conduct such a crime trial lawer from fb area from Kharian lawyer