Find a Lawyer

IRFAN GUL MAGSI versus ABDUL KHALIQ SOOMRO

Articles 12 and 99 of the People's Act 1976 [represented by the People's Representation (Amendment) Ordinance (CXII of 1996)] disqualified the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 264 and the repeal of the Ordinance Impact of 89 On the basis of cancellation, it was demanded that the assets shown in his nomination form be different from the value of the assets stated in a written statement before the Election Tribunal member who claimed that he was ineligible for Section 12. And was sought on the basis of the amendments introduced in 99, the Public Representation Act, 1976, which came into force through the Ordinance from December 5, 1996, and so on The amendment ordinance was not canceled before the expiry of four months before it was presented to Parliament, therefore, the law applicant was no longer entitled to the amendment's cancellation. The existing law should be presented as a consequence of disqualifying clauses to eliminate the effect of their elimination, despite the repeal of the amendments represented in Sections 12 and 99, the Representation of the People Act, 1976, by law fiction, of the elected member. The liability sustained by the source remains valid and will not be affected by such cancellation of the application filed during compliance with the law. best law firms from Dadu lawyer