Find a Lawyer

GLOBAL CONTAINER LINES LTD. versus AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.

Admiralty jurisdiction of the High Courts Ordinance 1980 Section 3 (2) Ordinance of Companies (XLVII of 1984), Section 2 (7) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 55 and 78 of the Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), and VII, R 11 Refusal to file a lawsuit filed under the High Court's Admiralty Jurisdiction, claiming to be a company incorporated under United States law, sought by the defendant. Who was neither resident nor had his own office in Pakistan. That the other defendant, described as the agent of the central defendant, was a company incorporated under the laws of Pakistan, had no involvement. And the reason for this action was not disclosed in the territorial jurisdiction of the Pakistan Treaty between which the parties were exposed, which included the loading of power and the ports of the ports, between the parties. There was no mention of any port. Neither the container entered Pakistan nor any container was landed at any Pakistani port nor were they disposed of, as recorded by the plaintiff, there is no reason to proceed to the ports outside Pakistan's territorial waters. Therefore, the High Court was present to file a lawsuit under the question The question is whether the main defendants were doing business in Pakistan, would lose their significance when there was no cause for the plaintiff in the Pakistan area. Plante was not responsible for any reason for the action, but was rejected in the circumstances. A. lawer from fb area from Phalia lawyer