Azad Jammu and Kashmir Public Service Commission Code of Conduct 1994 R 10, while the selection of candidates was kept in serial number 1 in response to the advertisement by the Section 42 Public Service Commission Petitioner. Respondents were placed on the interview as a result of serial number 2's constitutional request for respondent against such placement was accepted with the instruction that the numbers given to the respondent by the Public Service Commission Subject Specialist in its total numbers. Include not counted for Master Degree Holders in valid marks provided by the Subject Specialist Oops. Different subjects applied for selection, while experts were not available for all candidates, in addition, available experts had adopted different criteria for numbering and due to the absence of some candidates, any specialist ( Including the applicant) could not be considered by the Public Service Commission Facilitating Equal Opportunities Not all candidates had unanimously decided to include the numbers given by the experts to some candidates. The relevant rules do not require the Public Service Commission to be attached to the subject matter specialist, but rather it was at the discretion of the Public Service Commission to seek expert assistance or to exclude the numbers provided. Respondents or any other candidate were rightfully excluded from the consideration for the protection of the principle of providing equal opportunity without discrimination where, with the Public Service Commission being a legal institution, the selection of candidates did not constitute any rule. Which violated the fair choice
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
