Find a Lawyer

HABIB ULLAH versus CHIEF SETTLEMENT COMMISSIONER/MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, LAHORE

The provisions of the Transfer of Houses in the case of transfer of house to the respondents were finalized in Articles 10 and 11 of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Homeless (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1958. No legal action was taken against the transfer. After 27 years, the High Court rejected the constitutional petition filed after 27 years, saying that there is nothing in the record to indicate that the petitioner and other family members were, in fact, The transfer (defendant) applied for a transfer to the home. Staying with her was under pressure against the High Court order in the review that the petitioner requested that the defendant apply on her behalf and she denied the fact that the applicant had resided in the house. Applied freely for the transfer of which the High Court justified. In this case, after the expiry of 27 years, it did not exercise its constitutional jurisdiction which was in the past and closed transaction pat, thus, to leave the ION for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court. The leave to appeal under was not denied power of attorney advocate Chunian lawyer