HAZZARO ALIAS HAZZAROO versus STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 365 A / 307/324/149 Criminal Code (V 1898), Definition of Section 164 Evidence was recognized by the Special Prosecutor as the place where the assault weapon was accessible to the general public, but allegedly There was no private person involved in the recovery, a suspect was identified with a delay of 13 days from the date of his arrest, and six months after that, such identification was of no legal significance, especially. When it was alleged that he was shown to the prosecution witnesses before the identification test, he alleged that the accused's confession was false. I also had no weight because not only was it bent, but it was not properly recorded. As required by the confessional statement under the law, the impression of the thumb is obtained: the accused, while the plea was not guilty, was signed by the accused before the trial court and the defendant also signed the statement which clearly showed The impression of his thumb was obtained by the police by force and his confession was not voluntarily recorded as the magistrate did not raise questions on the accused why he was guilty of confession and did not tell him. Whether he confessed to the crime or not, he will not be remanded in police custody. It was important to point out that the confession was voluntary and without any greed, intimidation or pressure the magistrate did not record the foot certificate. A confessional statement under section (364) that was otherwise necessary, the CCP prosecution did not support the trial court's decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Jehangira lawyer