Find a Lawyer

KHAWAJA WAQAR AHMED versus THE STATE

The voluntary order settlement between Sections 145 and 561 of the Criminal Code (CRPC) revealed that the property was transformed in favor of the disputing party in the dispute over subsequent misconduct over the disputed property. The petitioning party reported to the concerned police and consequently the sub-divisional magistrate passed the order under section 145 (4), CCPC under which the property was sealed and the respondent was later called. That the sub divisional magistrate amended the revision order and the property was de-sealed at the order of the Additional District Judge. The Additional District Judge sought to have the applicant discharged by his application under 5 561A, saying that the order had been approved without the applicant's hearing. I was shown the title of the review request that the incomplete address of the current applicant was given by the respondent upon completion. The address was available in the civil suit file as before, by the defendant's mother against the applicant party, the applicant was presented at this full address in the fact that the presence of some miscellaneous persons proved a diary. As was shown, the court should carefully review the case diary regarding the parties' presence before passing the mandatory order. Even so, it was passed without the proper use of judicial mind, the order passed in the review was set aside, after the parties heard the circumstances, the decision to be reviewed in the matter was remanded. was done attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Topi lawyer