Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ versus P.I.A.

Contract Act 1872 Section 2 (h) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4, 25 and 185 (3) Services of the employees of the corporation (contract employees) are terminated by the contract before the expiry of the specified period, The order was challenged in the High Court but to no effect. The High Court rejected the applicant's constitutional application on the ground that the applicant, as a contract employee, could not appeal to the constitutional jurisdiction. Termination was a violation of the principles of natural justice and thus was not sustainable in law. That the elimination of the applicants was discriminatory, similarly the five hired employees were absorbed and their services were not terminated, therefore, the termination was against the principles of natural justice and fair play. And the case of many applicants was similar to that of the applicants whose applications were allowed by the High Court; therefore, they were discriminated against and denied the same assistance under which they were treated by the applicants for fairness, fair justice. , Were entitled to the principles of justice and justice. Sufficiently, the appeal was granted, considering the same operation of the unclean order of termination of the applicants, which was suspended at the same time. solicitors from Faisalabad lawyer