Find a Lawyer

IMRAN KHAN versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN

Articles 100 and 115 of the People Act 1976 Act IX of 1908 (IX of 1908), suits for Arts 49 and 156, for the recovery or value of articles of dowry, the first appellate court ordered the trial court and Decided to separate the decision. The limiting confession plaintiff filed a review instead of the second appeal The High Court changed the second appeal when the plaintiff and defendant occupied the dowry articles when they were living a happy marital life when the plaintiff was sent to the plaintiff's home. Is still using it. Constructive control under which defendant's possession of the property in the home was never equal to the plaintiff's unlawful / wrongful possession, he claimed that he demanded the return of the articles of the dowry a month before the institution suit. The defendant did not have illegal possession until the formal demand. It was made for withdrawal and the defendant refused to accept the consensus from both the courts ntly it was found that Dahej's articles were in the possession of the defendant and he refused to return the same. The finding was not challenged and was finalized The plaintiff filed a petition with the institution only a month ago demanding the return of the dowry articles. Of the suit; the first appellate court had imposed a restriction on the matter at which the request for review was declared as a second appeal and was filed within a fixed time limit. The trial court's finding was restored. list of supreme court advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer