Find a Lawyer

JANAT BIBI versus THE STATE

Expert revised jurisdiction in relation to sections 435 and 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 302/34 of the Contemporary Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 61 and 72 The testimony of a police officer was inspected to prove some of the documents written by the Inspector Police who had since died and the police officer who examined the suspect was the suspect. Because some documents that were not written by the deceased inspector were brought to the evidence by the police, prosecution witness / police officer, Police Inspector was written by an ordinary human writing dismissed by the trial court rejected all exhibits and documents were sent to the scientific and handwriting expert to expert opinion, the defendant's request. Almost all of the documents exhibited in the court were requested to be sent to the handwriting expert, who was not in the writing of the Inspector of Police, without mentioning which document was reported, the prosecution witness / No objection was taken to the confession of the documents submitted by the police officer, either the witness / police officer was examined in the inquiry, or the documents presented were the prosecution witness / police officer's statement during the trial law. According to the prosecution witness, the evidence was brought on record / by the police officer As was said in documents posted his statement was not available on the record to the police inspector dead hand and proposed. This manual online advocate from Matiari lawyer